Cullect is Not a Comment Silo
![]()
You’ve probably noticed, Cullect doesn’t ask you to create a new account to use it. It assumes you write on a weblog (or Twitter, or Tumblr) and that you want to continue.
This means when you read something worth writing about in any Cullect.com reading list (whether you’re a curator or not) it’s easy to publish to your weblog (or Twitter, or Tumblr).
Now there may be cases where you’d prefer to write a comment on the article’s originating website rather than your own. Some feeds publish the url for each article’s comments in the comments tag. This is the ‘Comments’ link sometimes available in an article’s footer. Click that link and you’ll be sent to the article’s comment form.
Whether your reaction is published on the original site or your own, Cullect tries its best to connect them. Making it easy for everyone to follow the conversation, wherever it lives. It just doesn’t live here.
comments
4 Responses to “Cullect is Not a Comment Silo”
Leave a Reply
I couldn’t agree more. I want to read first, discuss later. Thats how all feed reader user stories should go.
[...] Cullect.com is the best I’ve seen. Right now, I’m blogging FROM the article I just read, amidst my long collection of articles. See it here: Cullect is Not a Comment Silo – Garrick Van Buren [...]
This interests me, because I was wondering about a “feature” to add a comment to an article when it is recommended. This would make the #/Recommended link more like a tumblog or link blog. I could just sign up at tumblr I suppose.
Then again, there is something to be said for letting the articles / items stand alone.
[...] I touched on this in the Comment Silo post, this is one of the benefits of the ’send to; blog, twitter, tumblr’ feature of [...]